|




    

 
|
|



Southern Arizona Legal Aid, Inc. (SALA) is an organization
dedicated to providing high quality advocacy services to low-income clients. SALA
has stayed true to its mission even though the organization has changed throughout
the years due to numerous influences -- decreased funding being only one of them.
"Legal Aid" was first provided in SALA's service area by
the Legal Aid Society of the Pima County Bar Association. Spouses of local attorneys
interviewed applicants for assistance and cases were handled by the attorneys
on a volunteer basis. This program first received funding from OEO in 1968.
In 1974, following passage of the LSC Act, SALA first received
LSC funding for Pima County only. The program expanded, in 1976, to cover Cochise
and Santa Cruz Counties, into Graham and Greenlee Counties in 1978-79. The Four
Rivers Indian Legal Services program and the Arizona Statewide Legal Services
program were opened under SALA's administration in the late 1970's. With funding
provided by the Interest On Lawyer Trust Accounts (IOLTA) program, services were
expanded into Navajo and Apache Counties.
At the present time, SALA's service area covers approximately
54,079 square miles including seven (7) counties and fifteen (13) of Arizona's
twenty-one (21) Indian reservations. We serve three counties in southern Arizona
(Pima, Cochise and Santa Cruz) all of which share a common border with Mexico.
We also cover the entire eastern portion of Arizona (Navajo, Apache, Graham and
Greenlee Counties) with the exclusion of the Indian reservations within those
counties. Additionally, we serve the Pascua Yaqui Tribe whose reservation is approximately
20 miles southwest of Tucson. On October 1, 1994, we began providing Basic Field
services to the low-income residents of the Fort Apache Indian Reservation through
our White Mountain Indian Legal Services' office in Whiteriver, AZ.
Four Rivers Indian Legal Services (Four Rivers), a Native
American component of Southern Arizona Legal Aid, Inc., serves the residents of
eight (8) Indian Reservations located in Maricopa, Pinal and Yuma Counties including
those Native American persons who are part of the service population of those
Reservations and reside near those Reservations in border communities. The service
area is entirely rural except for those individuals who migrate between the Reservation
and town for employment or other reasons.
In each Basic Field branch office, SALA has, through IOLTA
funding and in collaboration with the local bar associations, established Volunteer
Lawyer Programs (VLP). Through these programs, we provide representation to 300
to 400 additional clients by referring them to a pro bono attorney. More than
2,400 hours of service to eligible clients were provided in 1994. Over 800 private
attorneys have agreed to accept for representation at least two clients per year.
At the end of 1994, 350 attorneys were available to accept new cases in 1995.
Our total client service area includes 214,895 eligible
clients. Approximately 111,880 of those clients reside in Pima County, 10,068
are within the FRILS service area and the remaining 92,947 are scattered throughout
our seven-county, service area. The client composition in our basic field component
is approximately 45% Anglo, 5% Black, 45% Hispanic and 5% Native American. The
clients served by FRILS are Native Americans living on or near reservations in
Maricopa and Pinal County who are affiliated with one of the four reservations
served. The clients served on or near the Pascua Yaqui Reservation are almost
exclusively Native Americans.
In 1993, SALA conducted a major priorities' needs assessment
in each of its Basic Field offices. A number of systemic problems were identified.
The Native American and Statewide components conducted separate needs assessments.
The needs assessment included clients, other provider agencies, and members of
the legal community. Statistical data provided in this report is based upon the
1990 U.S. Census Report and information provided by the Arizona Community Action
Association, Inc. - "POVERTY IN ARIZONA, a shared responsibility."
The 1993 priority needs assessment indicated that several problems continue to
plague Santa Cruz County's low-income community: the housing crisis, the substantial
and deadly environmental degradation and its costs in lives and illnesses, the
inadequacy of bilingual and special education, widespread employer disregard of
wage and hour laws and working conditions, and the continued poor performance
of the Child Protective Services office.
According
to the 1990 Census, more than 7,090 or 26.7% of the people in Graham County and
more than 1,009 or 12.6 of the people in Greenlee County lived below the poverty
level and, therefore, are eligible for legal services. This represented an increase
in Graham County of 57.9% and in Greenlee County an increase of less than 1% since
1979. Greenlee County was the only county in Arizona to experience a drop in population
between 1980 and 1990, decreasing by nearly 30%. In 1989, 14.5% of the total population
in Graham County lived on reservations. The poverty rate for those 3,644 persons
was 63.7%.
In
Graham County, the poverty rate among all families with children under 18 years
of age was 29.4%. The rate for families, with children, headed by males was 31.6%
while those headed by females was 60%. More than 64% of all female-headed families
containing children under five (5) years of age lived below the poverty line in
1989.
In Greenlee County, the poverty rate among all families with children
under 18 years of age was 11.3%. The rate for families, with children, headed
by males was 16.7% while those headed by females was 48.8%. More than 70% of all
female-headed families containing children under five (5) years of age lived below
the poverty line in 1989.
In April 1990, for Graham County, 4,639 people or 17.5% of the
population received food stamps. At the same time, 573 (9.2%) families were enrolled
in the AFDC program. (a 34.2% increase over 1985). In Greenlee County, 876 people
(a decrease of 40.4%) or 10.9% of the population received food stamps. During
that same time period, 114 (5.3%) families were enrolled in the AFDC program (a
35.7% increase over 1985).
The 1993 priority needs assessment indicated that several problems
need to be addressed. They are domestic violence, Orders of Protections, landlord/tenant
disputes, unemployment insurance matters, Social Security Disability appeals,
and divorces and post-decree actions involving custody challenges.
Based upon the 1990 Census, in Navajo County, more than 26,947 or 34.7% of the
people lived below the poverty level and, in Apache County 29,009 or 47.1% lived
below the poverty level, and therefore, are eligible for legal services. In Navajo
County, this represented an increase of 32.5% since 1979 and in Apache County,
an increase of 38.5% since 1979. In 1990, 49% (37,394) of all people in Navajo
County lived on reservation lands. These included 8,905 persons who lived on the
Fort Apache Reservation -- 52.8% below the poverty level, 6,091 on the Hopi Reservation
-- 46% below poverty, and 22,398 on the Navajo Reservation -- 55% below poverty.
The poverty rate for the non-reservation population was 17.1%.
Apache County's poverty rate was the highest
among Arizona's fifteen (15) counties. More than 27,000 or 56.2% of the people
on reservation land lived below the poverty level in 1989 while 1,599 (12.6%)
of the non-reservation population lived in poverty. (In Apache County, 65% of
the land mass and more than 79% of its population lies within the Fort Apache
and Navajo Reservations.)
The poverty rate among all families with children under 18 years
of age was 28.2%. The rate for families, with children, headed by males was 39.9%
while those headed by females was 45.8%. More than 46% of all female-headed families
containing children under five (5) years of age lived below the poverty line in
1989.
In April 1990, for Navajo County, 14,589 people or 18.8% of the
population received food stamps. At the same time, 1,593 (8.8%) families were
enrolled in the AFDC program. (a 21% increase over 1985). In Apache County, 19,096
people or 31% of the population received food stamps. At the same time, 2,347
(17.7%) families were enrolled in the AFDC program (a 29.1% increase over 1985).
The 1993 priority needs assessment indicated that some of the more significant
problems facing the low-income community in Navajo and Apache Counties were in
the area of family matter (divorce and custody), health care (AHCCCS/ALTCS, Medicare
& "Medicare" HMOs), public benefits (including SSI, Unemployment law, General
Assistance, Food Stamps, and AFDC) housing (foreclosures, private landlord/tenant
and subsidized), education and consumer issues.
|
|